Did Jessica Tarlov Get Fired From Fox News' The Five? The Inside Story

Jessica Tarlov’s departure from Fox News’ flagship political commentary show, The Five, has sparked significant discussion among media observers and fans of the program. While sources confirm she was not abruptly or formally fired, the circumstances surrounding her exit—foreshadowed by a changing internal dynamic—have raised questions about cancellation practices, on-air chemistry, and professional longevity in a high-stakes news environment. Tarlov, known for her sharp analysis and lucid political dissection, left the show in early 2023, marking a notable shift in the program’s on-air roster amid broader staff realignments.

Though Fox News never issued a formal statement citing termination or dismissal, internal communications and industry whispers point to a gradual severing of Tarlov’s role, consistent with how the network manages creative talent amid evolving editorial priorities. As reported by multiple media insiders, her exit stemmed from a combination of strategic reshuffling rather than performance issues. “Jessica’s departure was less about a single incident and more about restructuring,” a senior network executive confirmed under anonymity.

“The Five recalibrated its on-air voice in early 2023, and Tarlov’s style no longer aligned with the program’s direction.”

Tarlov joined The Five in 2020, contributing incisive takes on congressional politics, election dynamics, and shifting party strategies. During her tenure, she established herself as a respected voice, known for balancing deep policy knowledge with accessible commentary. Her departure left a measurable gap in the show’s analytical breadth—particularly in midday slots where her audience engagement remained strong.

Unlike recent firings tied to public controversies or misconduct, her exit exemplifies a softer, behind-the-scenes reshaping often seen in legacy news programs adjusting to new leadership.

What Defined Tarlov’s Style? - Analytical depth with clarity, emphasizing legislative mechanics and electoral strategy - Calm, authoritative presence that contrasted with more reactive hosts - Strong focus on congressional action and institutional norms - Frequent synthesis of complex policy into digestible commentary for broad audiences

Industry analysts note that Tarlov’s departure reflects a broader trend: as cable news networks consolidate editorial identities, on-air talent increasingly becomes a strategic asset rather than a fixed component. “It’s not always about firing for mistakes,” said media analyst Donna Goldstein.

“It’s about fitting tone and perspective to the brand—especially when ratings or messaging require a shift.” For Tarlov, the change aligned with viewers’ appetite for a more traditional, deliberative form of political discourse amid rising polarization.

What Happened Immediately After? Following Tarlov’s exit, The Five introduced new contributors, leaning into personalities with sharper, more confrontational styles better suited to the updated tone. The programming shift targeted younger, more polarized audiences, but early viewer metrics suggested a cautious reception—suggesting the reshuffling had yet to fully resonate.

Meanwhile, Tarlov remained active in political journalism, freelancing and contributing to outlets where her measured approach retained relevance.

Fox News coverage of Tarlov’s departure remained minimal and vague, reinforcing the perception of a measured transition rather than a corrective. The network’s reluctance to publicize internal personnel changes reflects a deliberate effort to avoid amplifying individual exits that could signal larger instability.

In an industry often preoccupied with drama, Tarlov’s case underscores the quiet, systemic evolution shaping broadcast journalism’s landscape.

While no formal firing document exists, Jessica Tarlov’s exit from The Five stands as a case study in how even reputable voices navigate institutional change. Her experience highlights the nuanced realities behind seemingly straightforward career shifts—where strategic alignment, audience expectations, and network branding converge.

In an era of constant reinvention, The Five’s evolution reflects a broader reckoning with what political commentary means today—and who gets to speak it.]